%
System Production Post-Intervention
Estimated Recovery from Feed-in Tariff Incentive: €320.000,00
CASE HISTORY
40% Underproduction of the System
Upgrading a 19.50 kW System under the Second Feed-in Tariff
In this case history, we present the optimization intervention of a photovoltaic system that was initially underproducing by 40%, with the goal of restoring maximum efficiency and ensuring 100% energy production.
Initial Situation: A 19.50 kW system installed under the second feed-in tariff, showing clear signs of deterioration, including broken panels and underperforming inverters.
Recommended Interventions
- Removal of the existing 88 modules
- Upgrading the existing structure for new panels
- Installation of 46 new 430W modules
- Removal of the two existing inverters
- Installation of a new inverter
- Upgrading the string panel and interface panel
- SIAD practice on the GSE portal
Guaranteed Results Post-Intervention
- System Production: 100%
- Estimated Recovery from Feed-in Tariff Incentive: €320.000,00
%
System Production Post-Intervention
Estimated Recovery from Feed-in Tariff Incentive
CASE HISTORY
System Underproduction of 30%
Upgrade of 86.94 kW System under the Fourth Feed-in Tariff
In this case, we analyze a photovoltaic system experiencing a 30% underproduction. The goal is to fully restore its performance through targeted interventions that ensure certain and optimal results.
Initial Situation: The system exhibits significant issues, including burnt cells and signs of snail trails, which compromise its productivity.
Recommended Interventions
- Replacement of 100 defective modules
- SIAD procedure on GSE portal
Guaranteed Results Post-Intervention
- System Production: 100%
- Estimated Recovery from Feed-in Tariff Incentive: €58.000,00
%
System Production Post-Intervention
Estimated Recovery from Feed-in Tariff Incentive
CASE HISTORY
System Underproduction of 15%
Upgrade of 18.49 kW System under the Third Feed-in Tariff
In this case history, we present the optimization intervention for a photovoltaic system initially experiencing a 15% underproduction, with the goal of restoring maximum efficiency and ensuring a 100% energy production.
Initial Situation: 18.49 kW system installed under the third energy account, showing clear signs of dirt that reduce the efficiency of the solar panels.
Recommended Interventions
- Professional cleaning
Guaranteed Results Post-Intervention
- System Production: 100%
- Estimated Recovery from Feed-in Tariff Incentive: €10.000,00
%
System Production Post-Intervention
Estimated Recovery from Feed-in Tariff Incentive
CASE HISTORY
System Underproduction of 25%
Upgrade of 150 kW System under the Fourth Feed-in Tariff
In this case study, we analyze a photovoltaic system that exhibited a 25% underproduction. To restore it to full efficiency, we recommended routine maintenance interventions and a complete cleaning.
Initial Situation: We found that 2 of the 27 inverters were not producing, significantly contributing to the reduction in performance.
Recommended Interventions
- Routine maintenance
- System cleaning
Risultati garantiti post intervento
- System Production: 100%
- Estimated Recovery after Activating the 2 Non-Operating Inverters from Feed-in Tariff Incentive: €5.000,00
URGENT INTERVENTIONS
Extraordinary Maintenance
Below are the extraordinary maintenance interventions we recommend to optimize the system’s performance and ensure efficient operation over time.
First Urgent Intervention
Replacement of faulty inverters with 1 Huawei 40 KTL-M3 inverter. This intervention would also allow for the replacement of 2 “operational” inverters, which can be used for future replacements.
Second Urgent Intervention
Installation of a remote control to restore the operation of the interface device. Replacement of the faulty minimum coil. Restoration of electrical connections for automatic reset (DDI).